The explanation by the President Bola Tinubu administration for why the commander-in-chief met victims of the Plateau killings in an airport hall rather than in their communities has done little to comfort a grieving nation.
Development Diaries reports that the presidency has defended President Tinubu’s decision to meet victims of the Plateau killings at a hall adjoining the Yakubu Gowon Airport rather than driving into Jos township, citing flight restrictions and logistical constraints as the reasons for the arrangement.
If anything, it has raised even deeper questions because when lives are lost in such brutal circumstances, empathy should not require logistics meetings or flight schedules.
Runway limitations, tight schedules, prior engagements, and ‘strategic considerations’ have become part of the language of governance, but for families who have buried loved ones, these explanations do not soften grief. And if this were a campaign season, would the same constraints apply?
In moments of national tragedy, leadership is defined by presence, closeness to the pain, and a willingness to stand where citizens are hurting. When that presence is reduced to a controlled environment far from the affected community, it risks sending the wrong message, even if that was not the intention.
This is also where the conversation shifts from optics to obligation, as the right to life and the right to security are fundamental rights that the Nigerian state is bound to protect. So, when citizens are killed and communities are left vulnerable, the government has a duty not only to respond but to do so in a way that reassures citizens that their lives matter.
Nigerians expect visible empathy and leaders who do not just speak about pain but are willing to stand in it, because when leadership appears distant, even unintentionally, it widens the gap between those in power and those they serve.
For citizens, this moment should translate into clear demands. Nigerians must insist on accountability for how they prevent them, demand transparent investigations into the Jos killings, and ensure that those responsible are brought to justice.
Citizens can also use their voices in practical ways by engaging their representatives, amplifying concerns through civil society platforms, and refusing to normalise responses that fall short of expectations.
At the same time, government institutions must act with urgency that goes beyond public relations, because in the end, this is about what citizens deserve from those elected to lead them.
Photo source: Getty Images
